Oct 30 2007
Cybook Gen 3 overwhelming demand
I was just at Mobileread and noticed this. Apparently, demand has exceeded supply and shipments are delayed until at least December 5th. So if you wanted one, I hope you were able to get your order in on time. So is this good or bad news? For their sake and e-books in general I am hoping that it is good news. Maybe people who were disappointed by Kindle’s no show and Sony’s BBeB format jumped at the chance to get a reader. Another possibility is the non-availability of the Sony reader outside of the U.S. If this is the case, Bookeen should have had someone better in charge of sales forecast analysis. Still, given e-books’ past lukewarm reception, maybe a more conservative outlook was called for. Also keep in mind Bookeen is rather a small organization.
Then there’s another side. Could it be that Bookeen’s delayed release dates and anxious potential buyers pressured them to offer their reader before enough were made? I think most people were willing to wait, but overall it doesn’t look good to keep missing a target. This way they have met their release date, created hype about demand (just like Sony), and at least satisfied the lucky ones who ordered quickly. Now their readers will be out in the wild generating interest.
Good or bad, how will this play out? A wait of at least a month after delayed releases has got to turn some away. I hope this does have a happy ending. The guys at Bookeen are great and their customer service rocks. Meanwhile, it’s a good thing I wasn’t in a rush to get one. I don’t think I could have survived the wait.

By now you’ve probably have read from several sources that
This topic has been on my mind for quite some time, but I have been somewhat reluctant to write about it. My reluctance stemmed from not wanting to end up in a “How-to get on the e-book dark side” situation. The following is something that happened and I would love to know what others think (Disclaimer: This is not exactly as it happen, but as I understood it).
Back in the day Palm used to sell expansion packs. Expansion packs were MMC cards with a collection of games, productivity software, or e-books. These cards were copy-protected and for the most part were not too expensive. I have the dictionary and the SciFi ebook pack. I don’t know if these expansion packs were ever popular, and I gave up using the couple I had because the card took up my memory slot. Now that devices come with more internal memory, additional card slots, and memory cards have gotten so much cheaper, I wonder if some sort of e-book expansion pack could be of use today. Let’s say I buy a new hardback book written by my favorite author. Included with that book would be an MMC or SD card. On it, the publisher could include a few of the author’s older titles on the SD card. What would be better is if the book I am buying is included. That way I could give away the paper copy and keep my digital edition. I believe that this could boost sales of hardback books. The publishers then could include first chapter excerpts of other works in the same genre. Then once a book goes to paperback, the publisher could sell the SD alone, or bundled with the paper book and charge more.
I have been reading a lot lately about how manufacturers seem to think that when we buy something from them, we don’t really own our purchases. In other words we are simply licensed to use the product, and can only use it how they see fit; for example, the iPhone update that would brick your hacked device. So could DRM not really be about preventing piracy, but rather to keep us tied to one source of software? That restriction would also keep the consumer tied to the seller. Isn’t this just an updated version of the main drawback of the original Rocket e-book? Then, all books were tied to the device. So instead of my books dieing with my reader, my reader dies if I decide not to buy books from the seller. I don’t get the thought process behind this. Isn’t it enough that an e-book reader is $300? Why would the average person pay that much for a device that has only one source of material? Would the iPod be as popular if the only way you could get songs were to buy them from iTunes? 
Posts


